07-19-2009 06:33 AM
07-19-2009 10:52 AM
07-24-2009 02:23 AM
I have a 100MBit up and down fibreoptic with my ISP. I made a speedtest script that measured my download speed every hour from a speedtest server in my neigherhood (from my ISP). I logged those results and these confirm what been said in this topic:
do 23-07-2009 17:49:11,10
[10494]17:49:57 (11.13 MB/s) - `512MByte.bin' saved [536870912/536870912]
do 23-07-2009 18:49:57,04
[10494]18:50:43 (11.13 MB/s) - `512MByte.bin' saved [536870912/536870912]
do 23-07-2009 19:50:43,10
[10494]19:51:31 (10.67 MB/s) - `512MByte.bin' saved [536870912/536870912]
do 23-07-2009 20:51:32,14
[10494]20:52:32 (8.68 MB/s) - `512MByte.bin' saved [536870912/536870912]
do 23-07-2009 21:52:33,09
[10494]21:53:19 (11.13 MB/s) - `512MByte.bin' saved [536870912/536870912]
do 23-07-2009 22:53:19,09
[10494]22:54:17 (8.83 MB/s) - `512MByte.bin' saved [536870912/536870912]
do 23-07-2009 23:54:17,07
[10494]23:55:15 (8.83 MB/s) - `512MByte.bin' saved [536870912/536870912]
vr 24-07-2009 0:55:15,06
[10494]00:56:13 (8.83 MB/s) - `512MByte.bin' saved [536870912/536870912]
vr 24-07-2009 1:56:13,03
[10494]01:57:11 (8.83 MB/s) - `512MByte.bin' saved [536870912/536870912]
vr 24-07-2009 2:57:11,10
[10494]02:58:09 (8.83 MB/s) - `512MByte.bin' saved [536870912/536870912]
vr 24-07-2009 3:58:08,09
[10494]03:59:06 (8.83 MB/s) - `512MByte.bin' saved [536870912/536870912]
vr 24-07-2009 4:59:06,09
[10494]05:00:06 (8.53 MB/s) - `512MByte.bin' saved [536870912/536870912]
vr 24-07-2009 6:00:06,09
[10494]06:01:04 (8.83 MB/s) - `512MByte.bin' saved [536870912/536870912]
vr 24-07-2009 7:01:04,12
[10494]07:02:06 (8.26 MB/s) - `512MByte.bin' saved [536870912/536870912]
vr 24-07-2009 8:02:06,10
[10494]08:03:57 (4.61 MB/s) - `512MByte.bin' saved [536870912/536870912]
vr 24-07-2009 9:03:56,07
[10494]09:06:12 (3.76 MB/s) - `512MByte.bin' saved [536870912/536870912]
vr 24-07-2009 10:06:12,10
[10494]10:09:28 (2.61 MB/s) - `512MByte.bin' saved [536870912/536870912]
vr 24-07-2009 11:09:28,14
[10494]11:13:11 (2.30 MB/s) - `512MByte.bin' saved [536870912/536870912]
The funny thing is that if you change something in the router config (doesn't matter what!) and press 'save settings' the speed is back!
I can also confirm that if you disable UPnP the speed is back and stays high.
Let's hope Linksys will update their firmware. Has anyone notified Linksys about this yet or do they read their own forums?
Or in the near future hopefully DD-WRT for WRT320N will be released.
07-29-2009 03:19 AM
I am away to be buying a WRT320N, does disabling the uPnP work, what does uPnP do anyway? I don't want to buy it if it's just going to cause me problems, but I can do with the gigabit connection for wired gigabit network drive and my pc, and use the wifi for my laptop.
08-14-2009 11:30 AM
Has anyone seen the problem with AT&T/SBC Global DSL service?
08-18-2009 09:35 AM
Just so you people know, I have WRT600N and I have exactly the same problem with it and by disabling upnp, I have been able to stop this odd behavior of slow down.
I just wander if other models have same problem.
08-25-2009 01:54 AM
new firmware (1.0.3 build 10) just released.
Do you guys verify this firmware solve the uPnP issue & stable?
I am going to buy this one broadband router.
Thanks
08-25-2009 02:07 AM
release notes:
1.0.03 build 10 1. Fixed some failed case with UPnP.
2. FIxed issue with Radius server settings
3. Fixed Static route where some entry can not be added.
4. Fixed configuration via Network Magic
5. FIxed PPTP internet connection type not working correctly with
COnnect on demand.
6. Fixed issue with blocking NMH remote access from working
7. Fixed some HND services that may break connect on Demand option.
8. Fixed various HND issues.
cool! but I don't see a specific wan speed note... do see Upnp mentioning...fingers crossed.
will try tonight and let the router stay on for 24 hours to see if the wan speed slowdown is gone. Will get back here.
08-26-2009 07:09 AM
I installed the newest firmware and enabled UPnP and the WAN speed is still high and stable!
Here's my speedlog:
--------------------
di 25-08-2009 21:36:54,50
[10494]21:37:40 (11.38 MB/s) - `512MByte.bin' saved [536870912/536870912]
di 25-08-2009 22:37:40,09
[10494]22:38:26 (11.13 MB/s) - `512MByte.bin' saved [536870912/536870912]
di 25-08-2009 23:38:26,10
[10494]23:39:12 (11.13 MB/s) - `512MByte.bin' saved [536870912/536870912]
wo 26-08-2009 0:39:11,03
[10494]00:39:56 (11.38 MB/s) - `512MByte.bin' saved [536870912/536870912]
wo 26-08-2009 1:39:56,14
[10494]01:40:42 (11.13 MB/s) - `512MByte.bin' saved [536870912/536870912]
wo 26-08-2009 2:40:42,14
[10494]02:41:28 (11.13 MB/s) - `512MByte.bin' saved [536870912/536870912]
wo 26-08-2009 3:41:27,09
[10494]03:42:13 (11.13 MB/s) - `512MByte.bin' saved [536870912/536870912]
wo 26-08-2009 4:42:12,09
[10494]04:42:58 (11.13 MB/s) - `512MByte.bin' saved [536870912/536870912]
wo 26-08-2009 5:42:57,14
[10494]05:43:43 (11.13 MB/s) - `512MByte.bin' saved [536870912/536870912]
wo 26-08-2009 6:43:42,07
[10494]06:44:28 (11.13 MB/s) - `512MByte.bin' saved [536870912/536870912]
wo 26-08-2009 7:44:30,07
[10494]07:45:16 (11.13 MB/s) - `512MByte.bin' saved [536870912/536870912]
wo 26-08-2009 8:45:16,10
[10494]08:46:02 (11.13 MB/s) - `512MByte.bin' saved [536870912/536870912]
wo 26-08-2009 9:46:02,10
[10494]09:46:48 (11.13 MB/s) - `512MByte.bin' saved [536870912/536870912]
--------------------
wo 26-08-2009 11:02:51,06
[10494]11:03:37 (11.13 MB/s) - `512MByte.bin' saved [536870912/536870912]
wo 26-08-2009 12:03:37,07
[10494]12:04:23 (11.13 MB/s) - `512MByte.bin' saved [536870912/536870912]
wo 26-08-2009 13:04:23,07
[10494]13:05:09 (11.13 MB/s) - `512MByte.bin' saved [536870912/536870912]
wo 26-08-2009 14:05:09,14
[10494]14:05:55 (11.13 MB/s) - `512MByte.bin' saved [536870912/536870912]
wo 26-08-2009 15:05:55,10
[10494]15:06:41 (11.13 MB/s) - `512MByte.bin' saved [536870912/536870912]
08-26-2009 10:51 AM - last edited on 08-26-2009 10:56 AM
According to Speedtest.net the latency is a lot faster (2ms compared to 18ms) and the speeds have improved also (94Mbit down/80Mbit up compared to 49Mbit/39Mbit)
I installed the new firmware just this afternoon so further testing has to be done, but it seems that most problems are fixed.
If not, www.dd-wrt.com is working on support for the 320N, it's still work in progress so we'll just have to wait for it.
